Chapter 18 - Opal’s Lawyer Asked the Wrong QuestionThe court protected Tessa.
She did not sit feet away from Opal.
She gave recorded testimony with a child specialist present.
The defense still challenged her.
“You love your mother?”
“Yes.”
“You were scared that day?”
“Yes.”
“You were angry at Ms. Reed?”
“Yes.”
“Could anger make you remember something incorrectly?”
Tessa thought.
“Sometimes.”
The lawyer seemed encouraged.
“You said Ms. Reed slapped Kai.”
“Yes.”
“Could she have been wiping food from his face?”
“No.”
“How can you be certain?”
Tessa looked directly toward the camera.
“Because wiping food doesn’t make that sound.”
Silence.
The lawyer tried again.
“You turned the camera on because you wanted your mother to see Ms. Reed being mean?”
“Yes.”
“So you had already decided Ms. Reed was mean.”
“Yes.”
“Meaning you were biased against her.”
Tessa frowned.
“I don’t know what biased means.”
The attorney explained.
“It means you already believed something bad about her.”
Tessa considered.
“I believed she was bad because she hit my brother.”
The prosecutor almost objected.
Then didn’t.
The answer stood.
The defense shifted.
“Ms. Reed says Kai was refusing food for a long time and she became frustrated.”
“He was crying.”
“Babies cry.”
“Yes.”
“Sometimes caregivers become overwhelmed.”
Tessa looked confused.
“Then you stop.”
The lawyer paused.
“What?”
“If you’re mad at a baby, you stop.”
The courtroom transcript later went viral after records became public.
Not because it was dramatic.
Because a ten-year-old stated the adult rule Opal refused to follow.
If you’re mad at a baby, you stop.
Then came the bottle.
“Did you see Ms. Reed put anything into it?”
“No.”
“So you cannot tell the court what was inside.”
“No.”
“You cannot tell the court who prepared it.”
“No.”
“You cannot tell the court whether your mother knew about it.”
Tessa looked at the specialist.
Then back.
“I know Mom asked what bottle.”
“That doesn’t answer my question.”
“I know Ms. Opal tried to take it when Mom asked.”
The lawyer continued.
“You previously told police Ms. Reed sometimes poured liquid down the sink.”
“Yes.”
“Did you know what it was?”
“No.”
“So you made assumptions.”
Tessa shrugged.
“I said what I saw.”
That was the case.
Not interpretation.
Observation.
Opal had spent months creating interpretations.
Tessa simply described what happened.
The prosecution then played the kitchen footage.
Opal:
Thank God she still hasn’t noticed the new bottle doesn’t look like the old one.
Celeste:
WHAT BOTTLE?
Opal reaching.
Tessa grabbing it.
Opal:
PUT IT DOWN!
The jury watched Opal’s face.
Then listened to the later recorded call from Nolan’s office.
Opal:
I never gave him enough to hurt him.
The defense argued that “him” could refer to someone else.
Then prosecutors played the next lines.
He needed to sleep.
Why?
So she’d take him to doctors.
No ambiguity.
Opal sat perfectly still.
Her attorney shifted toward diminished judgment.
Stress.
Grief after Nolan’s death.
Years of service to the family.
Emotional dependence.
A caregiver who blurred boundaries.
Celeste understood the strategy.
Make cruelty tragic.
Make control look like devotion that went too far.
Then Graham testified.
He described the theft.
The forged texts.
The guardianship plan.
He did not minimize his role.
That made him more credible.
“I helped Opal create a version of Celeste that would look unstable on paper.”
“Was Celeste unstable?”
“No.”
“Did you know Opal was interfering with her prescribed medication?”
“Yes.”
“Why help?”
“Money.”
“Anything else?”
Graham swallowed.
“I loved Opal.”
There it was.
Not noble.
Not complicated.
Human.
He loved her.
And helped her hurt people.
The prosecutor asked:
“Did loving her make what you did less deliberate?”
“No.”
That sentence damaged Opal’s defense more than anything.
Love did not erase choice.
Stress did not erase planning.
History did not erase harm.
Then the jury heard Nolan’s recording.
Opal insisting Celeste would break.
Nolan warning her away from medication.
Opal promising:
“You’ll need me before this is over.”
For the first time during trial, Opal’s face changed.
She looked toward Celeste.
Not angry.
Wounded.
As if Nolan’s voice had betrayed her from the grave.
Celeste felt nothing resembling pity.
Then the defense called Opal.
Against her attorney’s recommendation.
Of course she testified.
Control required the final word.
“I loved those children.”
The prosecutor asked:
“Did you strike Kai?”
Opal hesitated.
“Yes.”
“Was he one year old?”
“Yes.”
“Did you substitute his prescribed liquid?”
“I changed what he received.”
“Without his mother’s knowledge?”
“I was trying to help.”
“By causing sedation?”
“By helping him sleep.”
“Why did you need him asleep?”
Opal looked toward the jury.
“Celeste was falling apart.”
The prosecutor waited.
That was the mistake.
Silence made Opal explain.
“She needed time away.”
“She needed doctors to see how difficult things had become.”
“She needed to understand she couldn’t handle everything alone.”
The prosecutor asked quietly:
“So you created the problem to prove she needed you to solve it?”
Opal froze.
For the first time, she heard her own logic from outside herself.
The prosecutor asked:
“Isn’t that exactly what you did?”
Opal looked at Celeste.
Then Tessa’s empty protected-witness seat.
Then down.
May you like
And whispered:
“Yes.”
Related Stories
